Winners and losers of the Premier League 2011/12 part one

A roller coaster season ended with a roller coaster Sunday with Manchester City claiming the title thanks to Sergio Aguero’s las gasp strike, however who were the real winners and losers of the closest Premier League season for several years? 

Roberto Mancini

The main victor of the season has to be Roberto Mancini, as yesterday’s game moved into injury team with his Manchester City side 2-1 down to QPR the likelihood was he would be shown the door at the Etihad stadium. 

Instead he spent today touring around Manchester on an open top bus celebrating with his players after  taking City to the their title since 1968. 

It is a massive step for Mancini and his squad, many of whom have joined since Mancini took over in 2009. 

Throw into a season marred by constant speculation around his future, Carlos Tevez’s exile to his native Argentina and Mancini’s personal battle against the troublesome Mario Balotelli and you begin to see what he has achieved this season. 

Obviously he will need more than one major trophy per season to satisfy the big wigs at the Etihad, however it is certainly a start. 

Robin van Persie

It has been another fruitless season for Arsenal however once again the Emirates was lit up on more than one occasion by the irresistable van Persie. 

37 goals over the entire campaign led Arsenal to third place and Champions League football next season, something that was unthinkable before Christmas.

Speculation has rumbled on throughout the season regarding the Dutchman’s future and now as we head into a sport filled summer the rumours will grow and it is likely van Persie will depart the Emirates in a hunt for major silverware, similar to the departure of Cesc Fabregas last season. 

Newcastle United

The suggestion that Newcastle United would finish in the European positions would have been laughed at back in August before the season kicked-off. 

However a fifth placed finish has taken everyone by suprise this season with manager Alan Pardew even being talked about for the England manager’s position following the departure of Fabio Capello. 

He has built a squad of players, few of whom are household names and let them gel as the season progressed, a Champions League position was still achievable heading into the final game of the season. 

Players such as Yohan Cabaye, Hatem Ben Arfa and Papiss Cisse were unknown quantities when they were brought into the club. 

However they have been the fulcrum around which Newcastle have performed this season with Cisse netting 13 goals in 14 league games, not bad for a striker few people had heard of before his January move. 

Later in the week, the losers of the season will be analysed

 

 

 

 

England show progression with series win

Despite the success stories of English cricket in the past 18 months, their form in the 50 over format has left a lot to be desired.

However a change of leadership and a fresh youthful line-up has seen England hint towards replicating their outstanding performances in the test arena.

Alastair Cook was given the captaincy after England’s poor performance in March’s World Cup and since then has lead England to two  series wins one over World Cup Winners India.

Similar to the test team, the selectors have built a core team of five players who they have built a squad of 15 around with England strength in depth shining at the moment.

The likes of Jimmy Anderson, Ian Bell Graeme Swann and Jonathan Trott along with Twenty20 skipper Stuart Broad are the platform around which England are planning the build looking ahead to the next World Cup.

This series against India which England won 3-0 has highlighted this strength in depth expertly with the likes of Jade Dernbach, Tim Bresnan and Ravi Bopara all sealing their places for the reverse tour which starts in the sub-continent next month.

And with exciting prospects such as Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow waiting in the wings along with seamer Steve Finn England will be hoping this fresh young One Day set up may emulate their test counterparts.

Surreal afternoon at the Bank

I was not sure what I was expecting to be honest.

I’d never seen a team fight for their football league survival before and upon leaving Sincil Bank at 5pm today I still had not.

There was an air of inevitability around Sincil Bank before kick-off and during the game that this Lincoln City team were not good enough to stay up on there own.

And on the basis of the 11 games previous where Steve Tilson’s have not won a single game it seemed for the Imps to keep their league status they would need Barnet to slip up at home to Port Vale.

However after a goalless first half at Sincil Bank in which Lincoln missed several chances you got a sense of what was to happen in the final 45 minutes.

As news filtered through of Barnet’s 48th minute penalty the Sincil Bank crowd became hushed as a tentative second half began.

And as they have on so many occasions this season when Lincoln concede they lose the smidgen of confidence they have.

Danny Hylton’s penalty just before the hour mark saw the Lincoln heads drop, the Sincil Bank faithful began to lambast the players not encourage them and what had seemed inevitable before the game was now becoming reality.

Mistakes began to creep further into the Lincoln play and before long they’d conceded again as the 7,932 fans inside Sincil Bank were starting to realise they were on the brink of seeing the Imps seal their own fate.

But the factor of the afternoon I could not understand was the reaction of the majority of people inside the ground.

Few seemed to care about it at all.

Despite warnings throughout the afternoon about encroaching the field at the end of the game a good 1,00o strong mob launched themselves over the hoardings on the first blow of the final whistle.

They seemed more bothered about getting on the pitch and in front of the TV cameras than the fact their hometown club had ended a 24-year stay in the Football League.

And what is more frustrating for the club is that those fans that turned up today regardless of whether their attendance was one hundred per cent to support the club is that they will not be there next season as the club begin life in the non-league.

A beginner goes Orienteering

Standing in a room full of people dressed in lycra talking about maps, dibbers and compasses is not a situation I had been in many times before.

Despite being a keen sportsman Orienteering is never one that has featured too highly on my agenda, my only experience being on year seven camp at school 11 years ago.

Yet there I was fully decked out in tracky bottoms and trainers stood nervously anticipating what the next 45 minutes would bring as I made my debut at score orienteering.

I had been invited along by the Lincoln Orienteering Group to the final event of the four race series at Riseholme Park to give it a try and see how I got along.

As it was my first time as an O’er I was going to be going around with Ally Wright, the groups publicity officer who told me we’d be running around 5km if we complete the full course.

This came as a shock to someone who’s only exercise in three and a half years at university was a couple of appearances for a friends five-a-side football team to make the numbers up.

The plan for the evening was to try and find all 25 checkpoints located around the Riseholme campus in the 45 minute time allowance.

Before we got started all the competitors checked-in their dibbers which are an electronic device that logged you in and out of each checkpoint to show where you had been.

As the countdown began Ally and I quickly planned a quick route to the nearest point and off we went.

Now I must explain this type of Orienteering is different to the usual line format, where you follow a set of numbered points in a line and whoever does it fast enough wins.

Here there is no set course meaning you can do it in whatever order you want and that proved a further challenge given the terrain of Riseholme.

Orienteering maps are different to Ordinance Survey maps as they show different terrain in different colours based on how passable to route is.

For example thick vegetation is coloured dark green so it tells you although you might only be metres away from the next checkpoint, there is no way you could battle through the thick bramble bush that stands in your way.

And that is the challenge you have to find your way around the course navigating your way with nothing but a map and a headlamp.

Oh yes did I forget to say? We began at 7pm on a crisp early March evening meaning we were running in pitch black darkness, your pathway lit up by a miner’s headlamp strapped on your head.

We set off at a steady jog pace on the hunt for the first checkpoint which was strapped to the rear of campus building.

Ally was teaching me the basics such as what symbols meant and how to work the compass and as she guided us round the first couple I began to get the hang of this.

As we moved out in the grassy areas of the campus the compass was passed on to the trainee as I had a go at finding a checkpoint.

Looking at the key on the map, checkpoint 50 was located in a forest area around 30 metres in from the path.

Off we set counting our steps as we ran to see how far we were trekking knowing at some point we’d be diving into the woody landscape.

We navigated our way through the trees and within seconds could see the checkpoint, up we ran, clicked our dibbers and off we went again.

Still in charge of the map and buoyed by my successful first attempt I picked the next point and deciphered a route to it.

One bonus of night racing was the headlamps everyone was wearing and fortunately for us there were two heading our way as we progressed to the next check, meaning we were going in the right direction.

However they went by in a flash, the steady jog me and Ally were using was outpaced by the other competitors seemingly haring round the course.

We had now picked a good chunk of the checkpoints and decided to complete the loop at the top right of the campus before heading back to the meeting point as the clock ticked over the half hour mark.

It was after clambering my way through a pond while clawing away bramble bushes I asked Ally why she found the activity enjoyable.

“The feeling of accomplishment went you find the checkpoints,” she replied.

Whether it was the lactic acid I could feeling burning its way through my unfit thighs or the constant need of the water bottle I had left back at the control point, I decided I couldn’t agree with her.

I was told before I went out that Orienteering is like an Easter Egg Hunt you went on when you were a child. All I could think was what is the point of an Egg Hunt if there are no eggs?

And as I sat and watched the presentation of awards at the end of the night surrounded by people covered from head to toe in mud and sweat that was my thinking, what was the point?

Clearly these people saw it already busily planning there next outing some even eager to go and collect the control points as it meant they could get there compasses out again but not me.

I reached a respectable 14 out of 25 control points in the 45 minutes allowed, but as my muddy trainers are once more redundant outside my back door two weeks on, I fear it could be another 11 years at least until my next orienteering expedition.

Bresnan developing nicely for England

He has probably been the most interviewed England player since taking the wicket that meant England retained the Ashes, but Tim Bresnan is quietly progressing into a strong international player.

Having already nailed down his position in England’s limited overs side with a series of strong performances over the past year, he is now showing genuine promise in the test area.

Yesterday he helped England limit Australia to just 134-4 on day one of the fifth test in Sydney taking 2-47, almost a week since his spell of 3-2 in 15 balls wrecked the Aussie top order.

Tim Bresnan celebrates the wicket of Shane Watson last week at the MCG

Now 2-47 from 16 overs may not seem amazing, but when you consider his first spell was 5-0-22-0, in the afternoon and evening sessions he bowled 12-4-25-2, which included some fine swing bowling.

Even though he is described by team-mate Graeme Swann as being as ‘thick as a plank’ he is an intelligent bowler, varying his line and length in the One Day format to make scoring difficult, whilst persisting with a nagging off-stump line in the longer game, similar to old county colleague Matthew Hoggard.

The 25-year-old is getting into the nack of taking big wickets too, last week it was Ricky Ponting, Shane Watson and Mike Hussey, this week it was Watson and stand in skipper Michael Clarke.

Now Watson had barely played at anything outside the off-stump, he had progressed nicely to 40 with minimal fuss, before he played forward to a ball on a length from Bresnan. The ball just nipped away, clipped the edge and was pouched at first slip by Andrew Strauss.

It was clever from Bresnan, knowing Watson wasn’t wanting to play balls outside his off-stump, the seamer angled one  and nipped it away off the seam, snaring the edge.

Granted at full strength, a fully fit Steven Finn and Stuart Broad may be ahead of Tim Bresnan in the England pecking order, but if he carries on taking wickets like this, it gives Andy Flower and Andrew Strauss a real headache. However a much nicer one than last week after retaining the Ashes I’m sure.

With a World Cup coming up in the coming months and the possibility of no Broad, Bresnan could get his chance to be one of the first names on the team sheet, maybe even opening the attack and batting at seven.

All he has to do is keep taking wickets, fortunately for him, he seems to be quite good at that.

Five reasons why England have (at least) retained the Ashes

So for the first time in 24 years an England side has gone down under and  retained the Ashes, here are my five reasons why Andrew Strauss’ men have been successful.

Preparation is key to success, without it only comes failure and on recent tours, England have found this out the hard way, not this time however.

They played three warm-up games against strong opposition, acclimatised well to the Australian heat and more importantly got key players into good form.

This is the second one, you need several of your squad to be in good form. Usually your lucky to have two or three guys at the top of their game, England have had five of their six batsmen scoring good runs with the bat.

Andrew Strauss and Alastair Cook at the top of the order have been excellent at setting up good positions for England to begin compiling runs. There is no better example of this than at Melbourne on Boxing Day, where they closed the day 157-0 after the bowlers had skittled Australia for 98.

Cook in particular has had by far his best test series, hitting 235* in the opening test in Brisbane to steer the game into a draw, before scoring 148 in the second match in Adelaide a game which England went on to win.

Jonathan Trott has said his job has been made easy this series, coming in at number three with over a hundred already on the board has taken the pressure of him and allowed his own game to flow.

Knocks of 135* and 168* have seen him go second in the most runs scored in this calendar year, whilst three of his five test centuries have come against Australia.

In the bowling department, James Anderson has now propelled himself up the rankings, now appearing in the top three with Graeme Swann and Dale Steyn. However it has been the all round depth of England’s attack that has pleased so many.

Injuries to Stuart Broad and Steven Finn meant the two tour party members who had the most question marks over their selection had to step up to the plate.

However Chris Tremlett and Tim Bresnan have come into the side and performed admirably, Bresnan picking up the wicket which retained the Ashes in Melbourne.

The England coaching staff and management had no worries about bringing in these players, even though both are inexperienced at test level.

But this is one example of the team ethic this England side have, they are a team, play as a team and last night probably drank a lot as a team.

Since Andy Flower and Andrew Strauss took over after the ill-fated West Indies tour in 2008, they’ve really tried to mould a unified squad and that is what they have.

Since then there has been no test series defeats, a Ashes series win and a defence, a World Twenty20 Tournament win, One-Day wins over Australia and South Africa and there is no doubting this team ethic has been key.

With all this success and a strong squad it has breathed confidence into English cricket, something lacking since 2005 and to be honest, this side is probably as good as that one.

But this Confidence exudes out of the players, they don’t go out to compete anymore, they have a hunger to win and that has been very obvious on this tour to Australia. Despite playing less cricket than the tourists, Ricky Ponting and his men look tired.

In comparison, watching the England squad lap up the applause after some ‘Sprinkler Dancing’ at the MCG last night they looked like they could go on and play another five days cricket. Australia are in a transitional period, a mixture of older players and younger ones, chopping and changing to get the right formula. England have had the right formula now for some time, and hopefully that can last a little longer yet.

The fact is before the series the sides were classed as equal and they may be on paper. However, when you compare one team to the other there was only going to be one winner, as realistically, there is only one ‘team’ and that is England.

 

 

England v Australia third test

After watching Andrew Strauss and Alastair Cook dominate the Australian bowling for the opening hour this morning, I went to bed safe in the knowledge England were set for another mammoth total.

Mitchell Johnson had other ideas.

Yes the man who so far this series had played in one game and taken 0-187 before being dropped for his stinker, ripped through England’s batting order taking 6-36 in a superb display of swing bowling.

After the openers farmed the bowling at four an over before the first drinks break, Australia bowled England out for just 187, before the home side reached 119-3 at the close of day three at the WACA.

It was the first day in eight days of test cricket that Australia can say they won outright and it has given them a way back into a series that most people had written them out of.

One thing is for sure though, the way this series has gone so far either side can still win this game, England will need quick wickets in the morning however, if they are to take the win and with it the series.

Pietersen pushes England forward

Kevin Pietersen scored his first test century since March 2009, as he lead England to a commanding lead over Australia, before rain curtailed play on day three in Adelaide.

For the first time in history, England went past 500 in two consecutive innings, ending the day on 551-4, a lead of 306 with Pietersen leading the way with an unbeaten 213.

Resuming on 312-2, ‘KP’ and Alastair Cook began extending the overnight lead of 77, a simple push into the leg side bringing up Pietersen’s 17th test century, however Cook fell for 148 edging to Brad Haddin off Ryan Harris to end his 1068 minute stay at the crease.

Not to be deterred, Pietersen pushed on to his 200 ably supported by Paul Collingwood and then Ian Bell , as the Australian attack toiled in the afternoon heat. It must seem a long time since Australia took more than one wicket in a session, they have to all the way back to day one of the series.

However they got a glimmer of hope in the afternoon session as Paul Collingwood was struck in front to fall LBW to Shane Watson, before the rain set in for the evening at tea.

That first day must seem a while back for Ricky Ponting and his Australia as once again the skipper cut a frustrated picture in the field.

And that is the way England will want to keep it, as they look to win this test at some point over the next two days.

Cook ensures England maintain dominance

If James Anderson was England’s strike bowler yesterday, then Alastair Cook was their star batsmen today, hitting an unbeaten 136 as England reached 315-2 on Day two in Adelaide.

Cook was partnered by both Jonathan Trott (78) and Kevin Pietersen (85*) as England recovered from the early loss of skipper Andrew Strauss.

25-year-old Cook has now spent over 1000 minutes at the crease without being dismissed, this century following up his 235 not out in Brisbane last week, as England made scoring look easy whilst Australia whimpered in the field.

After the early loss of Strauss, England should have lost Trott as well, Mike Hussey the guilty party dropping him in the Gully, before Trott and Cook guided England safely to lunch. In the afternoon heat the host’s bowlers tired, all struggling to find the same rhythm as their opponents the day before, spinner Xavier Docherty finding it tough going especially.

Not that Cook and Trott seemed to mind, batting through the majority of the afternoon before Trott fell to Harris for 78. Pietersen took his time to get going, which is unsurprising since he has been waiting to bat for over ten hours if you include the Brisbane test, however for the man most in need of runs this series, he found it as easy as the others.

Flogging the Australian attack around the Adelaide Oval, similar to how he did four years ago on his way to a memorable century, Pietersen notched up some much needed runs, albeit against a much weaker attack than the McGrath’s, Warne’s and Lee’s of 2006.

Again similar to four years ago Pietersen’s partner kept plodding along nicely.

There is something serene about Alastair Cook’s batting, he is never rushed, he has batted conservatively, saving his energy, making sure he can be there from start to finish, if he carries on in a similar fashion there is a good chance he will repeat last week’s heroics of a ‘big daddy hundred’

Arguably the two men at the crease were the two most under fire England batsmen in the summer, both frantically searching for form.

Now they are the men setting up a fantastic chance for England to take a one nil lead and at the minute, Australia don’t look like winning a session, let alone two of the three remaining test matches.

No suprises over World Cup host decisions

Why did people think that FIFA would give England the 2018 World Cup? Why did we waste all that money on bidding for it? Do we not know FIFA?

First of all the man in charge of FIFA hates England, Sepp Blatter is probably one of the least popular sporting men in this country.

I am pretty sure if France had come up with the idea of goal-line technology being needed in football, even Lincoln City in the depths of League Two would have it by now.

He dislikes how the press and the public perceive him here but perhaps he should think about what he and FIFA do before wondering why we think of him so negatively?

The 2018 World Cup in Russia and the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Surely there isn’t much coincidence that these two ‘footballing superpowers’ are among the richest countries in the world right now?

Perhaps Panorama could have opened a can of worms, perhaps money is the root to FIFA’s good books, either money or the ability to do something groundbreaking like take the tournament to South Africa.

Look at all the other countries in competition, they all have a good league base bar Australia and even they are on a rise at the moment.

Giving it to Russia and Qatar allows FIFA to come out with the line of ‘we want to be able to build new footballing structures.’ If that is the case Western Europe has no chance of hosting the world’s biggest revenue maker until every country has hosted one.

Qatar may be building its football structure, but  2022 will be the only tournament they appear in.

Perhaps Spain have the right idea, whoever wins the World Cup should host it next. However it is quite conceivable that if that was the case EasyJet would be raking in the cash every four years flying people to Madrid and Barcelona for the summer.

With the rise of club football being ever greater than before, combined with the fact that people are beginning to see through FIFA’s web of deceit perhaps the World Cup might not be what it once was.